Luckily, digital pieces are more forgiving than watercolor! I was able to lengthen the fingers of the right hand (on the left), which seemed stubby despite being correct on the model Sometimes when we convert photo references to line art, something is lost in translation and that is where our creative mind must work with what 'looks' right rather than what the photo shows, else you could end up with some very awkward anatomy. A camera distorts things at times due to perspective and spacing, as well.
One must also be aware of the fact that the photo reference is not the end all be all! We must be willing to depart from it to get the most visually pleasing look, otherwise the image could end up a bit stiff! Some artists will even hide the reference after the basics of the pose are finished, which I find is a good strategy for breaking reliance on reference.
![]() |
| The photo reference compared to the final line art. |
![]() |
| From this... |
![]() |
| ...to this! |
You can also view an animated time lapse of the video here:
All in all, I feel I've definitely hit a milestone with this fully digital piece! Learning the ins and outs of Adjustment Layers and Layer Masks has really helped to open new doors for me and make my life easier. With masks, I can save my original image without having to start over, should colors not look right. The Cintiq has also made coloring digitally feel 200% more natural than my old Intuos. I have a good feeling that things will only get better from here on out!



This is inspired! You've made her a veritable gift-giving sprite. It's beautiful - the anticipatory hush and stillness of the scene in contrast with the movement of her hair and frock by an invisible and mystical zephyr - the air of anticipation, perhaps?
ReplyDeleteThank you, London! I think you really pegged the feeling of this piece down well. I'm glad you enjoyed it.:)
ReplyDelete